Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Graham Stringer (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.


Civil Aviation Bill

The hon. Lady is right in what she says, but all three mayoral candidates are wrong on this matter. It is completely legitimate for any constituency MP, including the Secretary of State, to oppose what they think their constituents do not want. However, it is also incumbent on any Government to consider the national interest, not just the interest of people representing west London. Exactly the same argument is used about High Speed 2, and the analogy is a good one. I chair the all-party group on high speed rail, but if somebody was driving High Speed 2 through my constituency, I would oppose it, because I would like to carry on being an MP and representing my constituents. That is a reasonable thing for an MP to do, but I also know that HS2 is good for the economy. Similarly, I know that constraining runway capacity in the south-east is extremely bad for the economy. It will do no good for the environment; it will just strangle the British economy.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c1026 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disability Compensation Aviation Airports Civil Aviation Authority Licensing Immigration controls Exhaust emissions Heathrow Airport Pollution Passengers Noise Weather Security Regulation
Legislation
Civil Aviation Bill 2010-12 to 2012-13
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk