Parliamentary Search

Debates on delegated legislation on Monday, 4 July 2005, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Rooker. The answering member was Lord Glentoran.

Budget (No.2) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005

Draft SI on budget (no.2) (northern ireland). Lords debate on motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room)

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
673 c23-49GC 
Session
2005-06
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Related items
Budget (No 2) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005
Thursday, 9 June 2005
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Smith of Clifton | 673 c41GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for giving way. On that point, it is obviously gratifying to many of us here th...
Lord Shutt of Greetland | 673 c29-33GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I too thank the Minister for his opening remarks, in particular those on legislation. Howe...
Show all contributions (24)
Lord Smith of Clifton | 673 c42GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for giving way. The point is that if they are going to send me two copies, why ...
Lord Rooker | 673 c45GC (Link to this contribution) If I remember rightly, when the noble Lord raised the issue and I looked in the book, Ulster Savings...
Lord Shutt of Greetland | 673 c45GC (Link to this contribution) That is the point. That is why I raised the issue. There were figures before. Last year, it was £195...
Lord Rooker | 673 c47-8GC (Link to this contribution) I shall look further into the specific allegations that the noble Lord has made. There is ongoing wo...
Lord Rooker | 673 c48-9GC (Link to this contribution) I am not sure whether that was covered. I have read through most of the letter. I shall come back on...
Baroness Harris of Richmond | 673 c38-9GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I will be brief, but I do not want to miss out on this very important debate. My noble fri...
Lord Glentoran | 673 c39GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I should like to speak on a topic that I intentionally left out, but which the noble Lord,...
Lord Glentoran | 673 c26-7GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for introducing the order. I also very much welcome his opening remarks about i...
Lord Rooker | 673 c42-5GC (Link to this contribution) The chances are—going back to my MAFF days—that these envelopes get filled automatically, and if you...
Lord Rooker | 673 c41-2GC (Link to this contribution) In the spirit in which I started off, I will do my best to make sure that we have informed scrutiny ...
Lord Laird | 673 c33-8GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I, too, welcome the presentation by the noble Lord, Lord Rooker. I join the spokesmen of t...
Lord Rooker | 673 c39-41GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I will do my best to address the issues that have been raised. On those issues that I cann...
Lord Smith of Clifton | 673 c27-9GC (Link to this contribution) I, too, thank the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, for introducing the Budget order, but I must reiterate my...
Lord Rooker | 673 c48GC (Link to this contribution) No, I shall give the noble Lord an answer. Public expenditure analysis shows that per capita—that is...
Lord Shutt of Greetland | 673 c45GC (Link to this contribution) The only reason that I slightly questioned it is that it is dealt with in the book, whereas other ma...
Lord Rooker | 673 c45-6GC (Link to this contribution) My note says that the Treasury is considering it. The issue is about re-using the unclaimed funds. H...
Lord Laird | 673 c46-7GC (Link to this contribution) I want to say something before we leave funding. I think that I asked him to confirm or otherwise th...
Lord Laird | 673 c48GC (Link to this contribution) Will the noble Lord be kind enough to write to me, and I shall attempt to put the matter to rest? I ...
Lord Rooker | 673 c48GC (Link to this contribution) I am more than happy to provide that information in a note and to make sure that it is forensically ...
Lord Laird | 673 c48GC (Link to this contribution) Was there a business case for the purchase?
Lord Rooker | 673 c23-6GC (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Budget (No....
Subjects
Administration Civil servants Doctors Health services Finance Education Government departments EU grants and loans Northern Ireland Pensions Public expenditure Parliamentary scrutiny Northern Ireland government Voluntary organisations Teachers Tourism Tax rates and bands Waterways Ireland Ulster University
Legislation
Budget (No. 2) (Northern Ireland) Order 2005
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk