Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Keir Mather (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 10 June 2026. It occurred during Debate on bill on Railways Bill.


Railways Bill

The right hon. Lady is absolutely right that accountability and transparency should be at the heart of this. I think we have pointed to a bit of a discrepancy between the views of the major parties on how that should take place. It would be an interesting argument to say that, on the one hand, we did not want to micromanage the railway but then to put on the face of the Bill lots of key performance indicators that would allow us to do so. Nevertheless, the right hon. Lady is right to highlight the sentiment that accountability needs to run to the heart of GBR. That is what the passenger watchdog is there for: to enforce consumer standards on the railway as licence conditions for all operators. I thank her for raising that important point.

Finally, I pay tribute to the hon. Member for Didcot and Wantage for his new clause 56, on antisocial noise. That is a debate that I certainly want to take forward, and he knows how passionate I was on that matter in Committee. I thank Members once again for their contributions and for getting the Railways Bill on track for what I am sure will be a pleasant journey through the other place.

Question put and agreed to.

New clause 48 accordingly read a Second time, and added to the Bill .


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
787 c397 
Session
2026-27
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Staff Access Disability Conditions of employment Accountability Devolution Concessions Finance Licensing Freight Franchises Property transfer Railways Parliamentary scrutiny Passengers Railway track Standards Carbon emissions Wales Tickets Great British Railways Office of Rail and Road
Legislation
Railways Bill 2024-26 to 2026-27
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk