Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 March 2019. It occurred during Debate on bill on Trade Bill.


Trade Bill

My Lords, as one of those who supported the amendment of the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, I thank the Minister for her efforts in the meantime and for the publication of the Command Paper, which is a useful production and provides greater clarity on the Government’s intentions.

I shall make two small points. First, this legislation really matters. It could be—I hope it will not be—that within three weeks we will have left the European Union without a deal, in which case the Bill, by then perhaps an Act, will be the basis for Britain’s future independent trade policy. So we need to get it right. On the issue of parliamentary oversight, mandating and scrutiny, the Bill currently before your Lordships’ House on Report contains not one word added in that respect to the version we saw in Committee. The problem is the Government’s unwillingness to put in the Bill the provisions described in the Command Paper. That is at the heart of the debate we will have on Amendment 12.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
796 c617 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Animal welfare Agriculture Devolution Legal profession Environment protection EU law Legislative competence Hygiene Food Import duties Imports Ministerial powers Membership Public consultation Parliamentary scrutiny Origin marking Reciprocal arrangements Negotiations Standards Treaties Regulation Safety Trade agreements World Trade Organization European economic area European Free Trade Association Free trade Customs unions Dispute resolution
Legislation
Trade Bill 2017-19
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk