Skip to main content

1-100 of 722 results for subject:"Local development frameworks"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what steps he is taking to ensure that all councils adopt local development frameworks; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 March 2015
Reference
908063
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 09/02/2015 from Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon to Lord Avebury regarding the Ebbsfleet Development Corporation and affordable housing. 1 p.

Deposited by
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Deposited papers
Date
9 February 2015
Reference
DEP2015-0169
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, which local authorities have had their local development framework rejected by his Department in 2014.

Asked by
Lord Mann (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2014
Reference
209280
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, which local planning authorities do not have an adopted local development framework in place.

Asked by
David Ward (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2014
Reference
208137
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, how many local planning authorities do not have an adopted local development framework in place.

Asked by
David Ward (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2014
Reference
208138
House
House of Commons

When he next plans to meet district council representatives to discuss their Local Development Frameworks; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
904522; 583 cc591-2
House
House of Commons

I welcome the fact that King’s Lynn and West Norfolk council is one of the 55% of local authorities that have an adopted local plan. My hon. Friend and I met last year, and I would be happy to arrange another meeting with him and local council representatives, if he would like that.

Answered by
Nick Boles (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
583 c591
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that very helpful reply. Does he agree that, given the importance of localism and local authority autonomy, councils such as King’s Lynn and West Norfolk, which has plans in place plus a five-year-plus supply of housing, should have a very good chance indeed of not being overridden on appeal when it comes to speculative, opportunistic developments?

Asked by
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
583 c591
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. The key is having a robust five-year land supply and, if an authority can demonstrate that, there is absolutely no reason why their decisions about housing development should not stick.

Answered by
Nick Boles (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
583 c591
House
House of Commons

Many of my constituents in the market town of Garstang are currently under siege from developers, who are trying to bypass the local core development plan process and using their might to force through planning permission. Other than what the Minister has just said in answer to my hon. Friend the Member for North West Norfolk (Mr Bellingham), what extra steps might he put in place to ensure that local authorities keep control of where they want developments to happen and how they want them to proceed?

Asked by
Ben Wallace (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
583 c591
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend knows that the most important thing is that his local authority produce a plan. We are happy to support the process of getting that plan in place in any way we can. I can meet him and his local authority; I have officials who can help his local authority; and it can also get some help from the Planning Advisory Service. The key is to get that plan in place, and then the local authority will be in charge.

Answered by
Nick Boles (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 June 2014
Reference
583 c591
House
House of Commons

This paper has been prepared as an initiative of the Inter-Parliamentary Research and Information Network (IPRIN) with contributions from research staff working for each of the four UK legislatures.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
19 June 2013
Reference
RP13-39

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the average cost to local authorities is of preparing a local development framework; and how many such applications have not been accepted in the last year.

[146226]

Asked by
Stephen McPartland (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
146226; 560 c210W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps local communities can take to instigate a revision of a local development framework (LDF); and what powers (a) the Planning Inspectorate and (b) he has to revoke LDFs.

Asked by
Priti Patel (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2012
Reference
94208; 540 c228W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps local communities can take to secure revisions in the local development frameworks of local authorities.

Asked by
Priti Patel (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2012
Reference
89654; 538 c555W
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion to consider the Draft National Planning Policy Framework. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Hanham
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c345-88GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have not spoken in a debate in the Moses Room before: it is an interesting experience. The Minister, in opening this debate, talked about the developments that had to take place in the post-war period to repair the bomb damage and other ravages of Nazi Germany upon...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c366-7GC
House
House of Lords

If the answer is, regretfully, no, I hope that there will at least be the opportunity to debate the final document.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c387GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is not in my hands, it is in the hands of the business managers, but I hear what my noble friends have said.

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c387GC
House
House of Lords

I do not think my noble friend has answered the question that I put to her. What is the status of the local plans that have been adopted by local authorities? Some of them will have been adopted quite a long time ago. Will they automatically become out of date...

Member
Lord Reay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c387GC
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to my noble friend for giving way. The noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, asked about parliamentary participation in the final stage of the revised plan. My noble friend indicated earlier that there would be a proper opportunity for the revised plan to be debated on the Floor...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c386GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister, the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, for promoting and sponsoring this debate and for giving us a chance for yet another go at a debate on the NPPF. It has been a wide-ranging debate. My noble friend Lady Whitaker raised design issues; we had several...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c379-83GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it seems, like most noble Lords who have spoken in this debate, that I too must declare that I am a landowner. I am also a farmer—although more of a lifestyle farmer than some of the noble farmers who are here today. I should declare to those noble...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c377-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a landowner. I refer to the comment by the Minister at the beginning of the debate that everything that was said this afternoon would be taken into account when considering the final version of the NPPF. However, there is no opportunity for us...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c373-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a member of Newcastle City Council. I am on the board on One North East, a member of English Heritage and also of the National Trust. I agree absolutely with what my noble friend Lord Cormack has said about the nature of the...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c369-72GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an important document that will make a considerable difference to the way we live. Not surprisingly, we have had a large number of comments and objections, which should not be underrated. First, I tell the Minister that I am quite favourable to the new structure of...

Member
Lord Williamson of Horton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c372-3GC
House
House of Lords

I will give my noble friend an example of a horrible use of the word ““sustainable”” in practice. In Suffolk, where I live, the Suffolk Coastal District Council fairly recently—within the past five years—said that if you want to convert a farm building into a house it must be used...

Member
Lord Marlesford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c367GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend for that lengthy intervention; I was about to ask him if he would give way. The two criteria that I mentioned have merit, but in deciding on them, planners must take into account the nature of the historic rural environment in which the...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c367-9GC
House
House of Lords

I declare that I am chief executive of London First, a business membership organisation that includes property developers. Given the previous two contributions, I should perhaps also declare my past involvement in the regeneration of two textile mills in Blackburn. I enter the debate having missed the previous debate two...

Member
Baroness Valentine (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c364-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest as a landowner. We are lucky—perhaps the Minister is not so lucky—to be having this second bite of the cherry following our planning debate on 13 October. I am relieved, myself, to be losing the PPSs and the PPGs and starting again with 50...

Member
Lord Reay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c355-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, am very grateful to the noble Baroness for giving us the opportunity to discuss the provisions of the National Planning Policy Framework. I welcome very much the rationalisation and simplification of our planning procedures that will follow from it. Nevertheless, the point of discussing a draft...

Member
Bishop of Ripon and Leeds (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c353-5GC
House
House of Lords

The answer to that is no, quite categorically. It is not going to be out of date but the NPPF will then be a matter that has to be taken into account alongside it. I hope that I have dealt with the more general aspects. If there are specific aspects...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c388GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the planning inspectorate will be responsible for issuing the certificates and also for ensuring that the fast-tracking of plans is put in hand.

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c388GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is always a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Andrews, and it is always very difficult to follow a contribution as good as hers—but I will try. I agree with a great deal of what has been said on all sides in this debate. If the...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c361-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, for creating this second opportunity to look at some of the complex, wide-ranging issues raised in the National Planning Policy Framework. I was impressed by her saying how important it was to have a positive planning statement and...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c358-61GC
House
House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Draft National Planning Policy Framework.

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c345GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government’s intention to hold a debate on the National Planning Policy Framework, consultation about which has just closed, was rather pre-empted by the Opposition in calling one last week. We have also had detailed discussions during the course of the Localism Bill, so we have had many...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c345-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the Minister’s broad sweep, particularly for the ideas underpinning the document. In contrast, I have a short contribution in only two areas of this wide-ranging document, but they are areas which are often neglected. I sympathise with the Government in trying to streamline planning...

Member
Baroness Whitaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c348-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I predict that this debate will fail to satisfy many people. None of us will be able to say everything that we want to say, and those outside this House with an interest will be frustrated that we have not been able to. I think that the Minister...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c349-51GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must first declare an interest as a farmer and landowner in Somerset. I would like to entitle my intervention ““The challenge of change in the countryside””. The challenges include the fact that our rural population is growing by about 100,000 per annum, which is faster than the...

Member
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c351-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the local plans will remain part and parcel of the requirements that people have to pay attention to. Those that have already been developed can and should be updated. That is going to be done on a fast-track basis. I said earlier that discussions were going on with...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c387-8GC
House
House of Lords

I may have been so cautious that I did not get my point across. I mentioned earlier that we have undertaken a great deal of consultation already, but consideration is being given to whether there should be further parliamentary discussion on the final document. That has not been decided, but...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c386-7GC
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords for their contributions. It is the second time that we have had this debate in a week; it is remarkable how much the contributions have differed from the last time. A great deal has been added by what people have said and new areas have...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Notes
Statement corrected on 31 October 2011 at 731 c57-8WS.
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c383-6GC
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness sits down, can she just clear up one point that has been raised? Who will have the responsibility of issuing the certificates of conformity on those local plans and local government frameworks that have already been adopted?

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c388GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness has been very generous with her time, but, just for clarity, if there is a local plan which is otherwise bang up to date, would the introduction of the NPPF itself cause that to be out of date or incomplete?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2011
Reference
731 c388GC
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the Government's consultation paper on proposed changes to the planning system. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Baroness Hanham
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1835-70
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in contemplating the consultation document on planning reform published by the Government, I start by saying that in principle, and in general, I am actually with the Government on this issue, although I may differ on a few points—the two most important being brownfield and on how local...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1835-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must begin, as did my noble friend Lord Greaves, by declaring an interest as a councillor on a local planning authority. However, unlike my noble friend, I have managed to spend 37 years as a councillor without ever serving on a development control committee, except perhaps for...

Member
Lord Tope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1856-9
House
House of Lords

To call attention to the Government’s consultation paper on proposed changes to the planning system; and to move for papers. To call attention to the Government’s consultation paper on proposed changes to the planning system; and to move for papers.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1835
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest in that I am a member of a local planning authority and the local development control committee in Colne, which is the Colne and District Committee. Perhaps I should think about retiring. I sometimes complain that your Lordships’ House does not spend enough time...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1845-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Rooker for introducing this debate and for enabling us to make representations direct to the Minister without having to fill in a consultation form. It is not surprising that the draft national policy framework has caused controversy. Planning decisions necessarily involve balancing...

Member
Lord Hart of Chilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1842-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are a great many planning experts in this House, many of whom demonstrated their great skills and experience during proceedings on the Localism Bill over many days. Many of its amendments and debates focus on areas that are closely related to the current consultation on the national...

Member
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1840-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to everybody who has participated in this debate. The message is one of a revising Chamber; the expertise that you would not have in the other place has been on display here today among everyone, and in particular in the noble Lord, Lord Rogers,...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1870
House
House of Lords

I am always in trouble on this—the debate on 27 October also will produce extra thoughts. I am encouraged by the comprehensive nature of the points brought forward today. However, I shall inevitably not be categorical in responding to any of the points raised today as this is still the...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1866-70
House
House of Lords

I am not sure I said there was no need for housing development. I said I felt there was an almost infinite demand and that to try to meet that substantial demand was probably optimistic.

Member
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1865
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not know whether I am the first to do so, but I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Stowell, on her appointment and welcome her to the Front Bench. I should also like to congratulate, as other noble Lords have done, the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, who...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1863-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a fantastic and fascinating debate. There is always a depth of experience and wisdom around this House that very many people in other places will be jealous of. We pull together so much here that perhaps simply gets diffused elsewhere. I am enormously grateful to...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1866
House
House of Lords

That is possibly right, which is why I want to refer to need as the basis of a housing programme. There is also the question of the duty to co-operate, which some of your Lordships have mentioned, and which I entirely endorse. However, there is no actual mechanism, either in...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1865-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Draft National Planning Policy Framework is well on the way to becoming a sensible and civilised policy document. It secures a strong role for planning within the new localism. In the future that it envisages—provided local planning authorities have plans, local development frameworks, and provided those plans...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1853-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had not intended to take part in this debate, but I have been so impressed by the quality of the debate introduced by my noble friend Lord Rooker that I want to make one or two comments in this reunion of Planning Ministers. When we first came...

Member
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1862-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Rooker for having created the opportunity for this debate. As noble Lords can imagine, as a planning Minister he was a rather difficult act to follow. For a long time, people were obviously disappointed that I was not my noble...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1859-62
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while respecting what planning has achieved over the last 50 years, there is no doubt that it can still be improved: to encourage local people to get involved in the decisions that affect their lives; to reduce delays; and, indeed, to deliver the sustainable development that we all...

Member
Baroness Parminter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1851-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a timely debate on one of the most contentious issues of the moment, and I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, for introducing it and doing so in an absolutely excellent speech. It is appropriate that this Motion should be introduced from the Benches...

Member
Lord Reay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1847-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest in Rogers Stirk Harbour and Partners and as a director of the River Café, Hammersmith. I join in congratulating my noble friend Lord Rooker on introducing this timely debate. I will discuss the effect that this national planning policy framework is likely to have...

Member
Lord Rogers of Riverside (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1849-51
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment his Department has made of the relative legal weight of local development frameworks and the national planning policy framework.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 October 2011
Reference
71878; 533 c337W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what legal advice his Department has sought on whether (a) adopted and (b) post-examination local development frameworks will be technically out-of-date once the national planning policy framework is adopted.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2011
Reference
71920; 533 c16-7W
House
House of Commons

(3) what assessment he has made of the adequacy of local authority resources to produce or update local development frameworks.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2011
Reference
71900; 533 c16W
House
House of Commons

(2) what (a) financial assistance and (b) other support his Department plans to provide to local authorities to update their local development frameworks;

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2011
Reference
71899; 533 c16W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what (a) financial assistance and (b) other support his Department plans to provide to local authorities which do not have a local development framework in place to introduce one;

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2011
Reference
71898; 533 c16W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many officials in his Department worked on the draft of the national planning policy framework produced by the practitioners' advisory group.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2011
Reference
71897; 533 c16W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many officials in his Department worked on the draft of the national planning policy framework produced by his Department.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2011
Reference
71892; 533 c16W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government whether he plans to put in place a fast-track procedure to approve existing local development frameworks to bring them up to date with the national planning policy framework.

Asked by
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 October 2011
Reference
71886; 533 c15W
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they intend to replace the advice to local planning authorities in Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Development Frameworks; how this will be done; and what other guidance to local planning authorities will remain in place in relation to local development frameworks.

Asked by
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Answer received between Monday 25 July and Monday 1 August 2011.
Date
11 August 2011
Reference
11286; 729 c430WA
House
House of Lords

The Minister has artfully described what an LEP is. Can he tell us what an LEP does? That is the thrust of the question.

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c647
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by thanking my noble friend Lord Lucas for raising the whole question of rabbits out of hats. I think that the answer was given to him by the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie of Luton: a question of time is a question for the usual channels. They...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c644-7
House
House of Lords

I will get around to addressing my amendments in a moment. First, I want to say how much I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, and my noble friend Lord Greaves that there seems to be some need in this section for an ability to knock heads together. My...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c641-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened with great care to the remarks of my noble friend Lady Andrews, who is no longer in her place, because I have an interest— I think that the appropriate adjective would be an historic interest—in the subject that she raised, the position of English Heritage. I...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c639-41
House
House of Lords

My Lords, scattered among this vast group of amendments are four amendments of mine. The Committee will be relieved that I do not need to speak for very long on them since one of them, Amendment 147R on the marine planning side, has already been spoken to by the noble...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c638-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak to my Amendment 147M. At Second Reading, I expressed my concerns about the proposed duty to co-operate as a replacement for regional strategies. As I then said, I am not particularly enamoured with the whole idea of regions. Particularly in the south-west, where I come from,...

Member
Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c637-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in speaking to my Amendment 147H to this section of Bill, I want to emphasise the importance of local businesses in the community. I do not need to say much about the struggle that many local businesses have now, and have had for quite some time, to cope...

Member
Lord Cotter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c636-7
House
House of Lords

147FJ: Clause 95, page 72, line 14, after ““authority,”” insert— ““(b) a marine plan authority, or””

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c632
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have Amendments 147FKA, 147HZA, 147HCA and 147HF in this group, which I will speak to in a moment. I will start with the question put by the noble Lord, Lord Lucas: how are we going to finish this Bill in time? I am sure the official answer...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c642-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, as usual, has been very assiduous in his amendments. I am grateful to him for tabling, in particular, Amendment 147FK. I declare an interest as chair of English Heritage. The noble Lord asked the Minister what would be included in the list of bodies referred...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c635-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we now move on to an important clause of the Bill, which provides the ““Duty to co-operate in relation to planning of sustainable development””. The duty applies to, "““a local planning authority, … a county council in England ... or … a body, or other person, that is...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c632-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps the solution to the difficulty of the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie of Luton, is to reach back into the history of local government and reinstate single combat between neighbouring chiefs, who would then be seen to be earning their salaries at least. In that great Gladstonian oration...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c652
House
House of Lords

It may be easier to consider the detail of the point that the noble Lord has raised when we come to discuss the next series of amendments. In general terms, there will be evaluations not just of the outcome of the local plan but of the way in which evidence...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c651-2
House
House of Lords

To take the Stevenage situation again as an example—there will be others—one authority may say, ““We are not going to have housing in our borough to accommodate you””. There are two distinct points of view, and there is no real sanction. If a plan does not get approved, that suits...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c650-1
House
House of Lords

I am sorry if I misled the Committee. I am well aware that LEPs are joint bodies, representing the interests of local government and business. I think that is what I described earlier. If the syntax of what I just said implied that that was not the case, I withdraw...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c648-50
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has been generous in speaking to all the amendments, but I want to be clear on the housing issue that the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, described. We have a similar issue in Luton. One authority with a desperate need for affordable housing that cannot be accommodated within...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c651
House
House of Lords

The process of co-operative working actually requires co-operation and a sense of shared purpose in serving the communities that the local authorities represent. There may well be tensions. There may well be situations where there is difficulty in seeking agreement. The law will place on local authorities a duty to...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c651
House
House of Lords

May I press the Minister a little further? Does an LEP have powers and resources to do these things, or is it a forum for discussion? That has value but it is not quite the same as having functions of the kind I have just mentioned.

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c647
House
House of Lords

What an LEP does is a subject for another debate altogether. However, it is well worth saying that it brings these local authorities, working together under a duty to co-operate in general terms, together with the local business community for the benefit of that community’s development in all the ways...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c647
House
House of Lords

I hear what my noble friend says with interest. First, will he reflect on having just described LEPs as representing business interests? Surely the whole purpose of LEPs is that they are a partnership between business and local authorities, and therefore represent both those interests, not just one of them....

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c648
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what I am describing is exactly the vehicle through which power is exercised—the duty to co-operate and the construction of local plans. That is exactly what we are engaged in. The interface between the LEP and this process is important. We may have accidentally entered into something that...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c648
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, said, I and my noble friend Lord Tope, have tabled Amendment 153AKC, which proposes a new clause, entitled, "““Health and diversity of town centres and high streets””." Before speaking directly to that amendment, I should first acknowledge the work of my noble...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c685-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have tabled Amendment 153AKA in this group. It requires the local authority to prepare and maintain a retail diversity scheme as part of the local development scheme. It calls for a sequential approach to the development of a hierarchy, putting existing centres first, followed by edge-of-centre locations...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c684-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment addresses the issue of keeping trade local. I am sure many Members, Ministers and others will be aware over a number of years that there have been sustained campaigns on this issue of keeping variety and choice for the consumer, the issue of protecting small shops...

Member
Lord Cotter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c683-4
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister repeat what has been placed in the Library this week? Was this today or yesterday? What notification has been given of that?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c681
House
House of Lords

I am sorry, my Lords, my notes here say that it was placed in the House Library this week for information. Indeed, I think that I referred earlier to draft regulations that have been placed in the Library this week for the information of noble Lords. I hope that that...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c681-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a very useful debate. I do not think that the Committee is very far apart on the essential importance of housing and making housing one of the key ingredients of the planning process. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Greengross, for the typically intelligent and...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2011
Reference
729 c680-1
House
House of Lords