Proceeding contribution from Charles Walker (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
One of my constituents’ concerns is the expansion of Stansted airport, which wants not only to increase capacity on one runway but to construct another runway. It is all very well for the Government to talk about reducing emissions, but is it not understood that that does not square with the planned massive expansion of air travel over the next 10 to 15 years?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 437 c63
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Consumers Aviation Air traffic control Buildings Aircraft Airports Air routes Airlines Health Finance Fees and charges Licensing Insurance Insulation Protection Pollution control Noise Night flying Radar Standards East Midlands Airport London airports Air Travel Trust Airspace
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 00:15:29 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266036
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266036
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266036