Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Mark Todd (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.

Civil Aviation Bill

My hon. Friend is making a powerful argument. In my brief contribution to Second Reading, I made the same point—there is no independent process for determining whether the control regime, or the charging regime that stems from it, is appropriate to the circumstances. My one doubt about my hon. Friend’s amendment—which, I recognise, has local support—relates to the choice of the local authority as arbiter. The Civil Aviation Authority, or a similar body, would be much more appropriate to determine whether such a scheme is well designed.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
437 c65 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Consumers Aviation Air traffic control Buildings Aircraft Airports Air routes Airlines Health Finance Fees and charges Licensing Insurance Insulation Protection Pollution control Noise Night flying Radar Standards East Midlands Airport London airports Air Travel Trust Airspace
Legislation
Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk