Proceeding contribution from Jeremy Wright (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
My constituents are affected by a much smaller airport than Heathrow, but I agree wholeheartedly with a great deal of what the hon. Gentleman has said. Is not one of the main reasons why neither his constituents nor mine trust the Government’s proposed regime adequately to address their needs the fact that the Government are not really committed to reducing decibel levels to a point at which people will not be disturbed? That is why people feel the need to retain a limit on aircraft movements, and why they will not accept a noise substitute.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 437 c80
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Consumers Aviation Air traffic control Buildings Aircraft Airports Air routes Airlines Health Finance Fees and charges Licensing Insurance Insulation Protection Pollution control Noise Night flying Radar Standards East Midlands Airport London airports Air Travel Trust Airspace
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:56:30 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266086
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266086
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266086