Proceeding contribution from Karen Buck (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
I am not sure what the hon. Gentleman means. I cannot see that there is third-party liability; this is a form of compulsory insurance. We weighed up a number of pros and cons—the argument was finely balanced—and we found no other area of public policy where we would expect people to be insured compulsorily.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 437 c115
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Consumers Aviation Air traffic control Buildings Aircraft Airports Air routes Airlines Health Finance Fees and charges Licensing Insurance Insulation Protection Pollution control Noise Night flying Radar Standards East Midlands Airport London airports Air Travel Trust Airspace
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:02:38 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266165
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266165
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_266165