Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Karen Buck (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 October 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.


Civil Aviation Bill

If my memory serves me, the default position is about 40 km from the central airport, and it can be extended further to 60 km. I believe that ““local”” is reasonably widely defined, and I hope that that is enough to satisfy the hon. and learned Gentleman that his concerns are covered by the powers in the Bill. I appreciate hon. Members’ concerns regarding the powers by which we control noise at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted. That was also the subject of a considerable amount of discussion in Committee. Any future proposals for changes to the noise control regime at Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted would be subject to public consultation. The next night restrictions regime until 2012 will be based on current legislation and will continue to incorporate a movements limit. Airports’ ability to set up noise control measures and impose penalties on aircraft operators will be enshrined in statute, but airports should follow a ““balanced approach”” when introducing new measures. The Bill will also transfer the costs of the CAA’s aviation health unit from the taxpayer to the aviation industry; a much fairer arrangement because those that benefit from this service will pay for it. Our Bill will sweep away unnecessary restrictions on public airport companies to develop their businesses.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
437 c117 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Consumers Aviation Air traffic control Buildings Aircraft Airports Air routes Airlines Health Finance Fees and charges Licensing Insurance Insulation Protection Pollution control Noise Night flying Radar Standards East Midlands Airport London airports Air Travel Trust Airspace
Legislation
Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk