Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Crawley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

I thank the noble Earl, Lord Attlee, for answering the question of the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, on my behalf. If there is anything further to add I will write to her, but I believe that the paid instruction aspect is the key. In response to the noble Earl, I believe that there is an obligation on instructors to be in a position to be confident that the people they are instructing are in a position to go ahead with their test, but if someone wishes to go ahead my noble friend Lord Simon is right that they can do so but not with any vehicle in the ownership of the instructor. The noble Lord, Lord Mawhinney, made a good point about informed consumers. Perhaps I could take it away and give him a detailed answer on Report. On Question, amendment agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
674 c1173-4 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Crime prevention Advertising Bus lanes Buses Cameras Cycling Fraud Fees and charges Immobilisation of vehicles Fixed penalties Level crossings Exhaust emissions Large goods vehicles Driving instruction Helmets Medical examinations Motor vehicles Pollution control Motorcycles Motorway service areas Registration Young people Working hours Safety Roads Road traffic control Testing Road signs and markings Speed limits Road traffic offences Vehicle number plates Driving licences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk