Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Children and Adoption Bill [HL].


Children and Adoption Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am grateful to both noble Baronesses. I suspected that the noble Baroness, Lady Howarth, might criticise the amendment for being too parent-centred, which is why I included in it a specific reference to the paramountcy principle. However, I do not see what is wrong with saying that the court has this option at its disposal while all the time being required to have regard to the paramountcy principle. Of course, the statement by Lord Justice Wall is very welcome, but those who have made representations to me have said that although some judges may have this point at the forefront of their minds, others do not. That is perhaps not something that we can settle today, beyond my telling the Minister that I welcome her recognition of this issue and that the courts, in appropriate circumstances, should be encouraged to look at it as an option in the menu. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 25A not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c919 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Children Adoption Abuse Children's rights CAFCASS Arbitration Contact orders Absent parents Custody Finance Fees and charges Foster care Enforcement Domestic abuse Divorce Intercountry adoption Family law Abduction Family proceedings Parents Monitoring Staff Parental responsibility Registration Training Safety Separation Risk assessment
Legislation
Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk