Proceeding contribution from Richard Caborn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 6 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Olympics Bill 2005-06.
London Olympics Bill
I am not saying that at all. What I am saying is that such things will be reviewed at the time. That is why we are not prepared to accept the new clause. It would be wrong at this stage to include that type of cap on the various funding streams. That could be deployed at a later stage.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 440 c778
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Compensation Compulsory purchase Betting Advertising Costs Business Council tax Contracts for services Finance Land Greater London Greater London Authority Infrastructure Facilities Local government Property transfer Planning Olympic Games National Lottery Location Paralympic Games Sales Regional planning and development Sports Touting Transport for London Tickets Regional development agencies London Development Agency London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority
- Legislation
- London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:05:06 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_284240
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_284240
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_284240