Proceeding contribution from Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
I understand that for the time being, ID cards will be voluntary. The only documentation with which an individual could confirm his identity would be a passport. I see no reason why a copy of such a document could not be handed to the individual to establish his identity in terms of facilities, doctors, schools, or whatever. That would be helpful. There seems to be some resistance to providing a copy, particularly given Andy Burnham’s comments in the other place. What is the logic behind that?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c201GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Biometrics Bail Asylum Detainees Deportation Aviation Delegated legislation Crew Employment Equality Families Fingerprints Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Genetics Documents Equality and Human Rights Commission Freight Entry clearances Ethnic groups Immigration officers Private sector Police Railways Passengers Proof of identity Passports Social security benefits Training Refugees Transport Shipping Right of search
- Legislation
- Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:52:22 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291899
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291899
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291899