Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.


Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill

As I understand it, where the passport had been retained and someone wanted to leave voluntarily, it is not our desire to hold them up. Passports are retained where there is a question of forgery or of criminal proceedings. We would seek to get such people re-documented as soon as possible. We would need to ensure that the documentation was valid for wherever they sought to go and would suffice for their purposes. I imagine that that would normally require us to refer to the issuing country. There may be circumstances in which we could issue other documentation. I can assure the noble Lord that it is not our desire to hang on to people who wish to leave voluntarily. They are perfectly at liberty to go. That is a critical point that we should put on the record.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
677 c204-5GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Biometrics Bail Asylum Detainees Deportation Aviation Delegated legislation Crew Employment Equality Families Fingerprints Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Genetics Documents Equality and Human Rights Commission Freight Entry clearances Ethnic groups Immigration officers Private sector Police Railways Passengers Proof of identity Passports Social security benefits Training Refugees Transport Shipping Right of search
Legislation
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk