Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Immigration Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
The noble Lord, Lord Avebury, is right: all of the matters need further elucidation. What I should have said in closing was that I suspect noble Lords may be keen on just bringing back Amendment No. 57 on Report and the others may perhaps be settled by way of explanation. I used the wrong word. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, for picking me up on it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c209GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Biometrics Bail Asylum Detainees Deportation Aviation Delegated legislation Crew Employment Equality Families Fingerprints Human rights Immigration controls Immigration Genetics Documents Equality and Human Rights Commission Freight Entry clearances Ethnic groups Immigration officers Private sector Police Railways Passengers Proof of identity Passports Social security benefits Training Refugees Transport Shipping Right of search
- Legislation
- Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:38:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291913
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291913
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_291913