Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 February 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Immigration Asylum and Nationality Bill.
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill
moved Amendment No. 42:"After Clause 45, insert the following new clause—" ““REMOVAL: PERSONS WITH STATUTORILY EXTENDED LEAVE (1) Where a person’s leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom is extended by section 3C(2)(b) or 3D(2)(a) of the Immigration Act 1971 (c. 77) (extension pending appeal), the Secretary of State may decide that the person is to be removed from the United Kingdom, in accordance with directions to be given by an immigration officer if and when the leave ends. (2) Directions under this section may impose any requirements of a kind prescribed for the purpose of section 10 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (c. 33) (removal of persons unlawfully in United Kingdom). (3) In relation to directions under this section, paragraphs 10, 11, 16 to 18, 21 and 22 to 24 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration Act 1971 (administrative provisions as to control of entry) apply as they apply in relation to directions under paragraph 8 of that Schedule. (4) The costs of complying with a direction given under this section (so far as reasonably incurred) must be met by the Secretary of State. (5) A person shall not be liable to removal from the United Kingdom under this section at a time when section 7(1)(b) of the Immigration Act 1971 (Commonwealth and Irish citizens ordinarily resident in United Kingdom) would prevent a decision to deport him. (6) In section 82(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (c. 41) (right of appeal: general) after paragraph (h) insert— ““(ha) a decision that a person is to be removed from the United Kingdom by way of directions under section (Removal: persons with statutorily extended leave) of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 (removal: persons with statutorily extended leave),””. (7) In section 92(2) of that Act (appeal from within United Kingdom) after ““(f)”” insert ““, (ha)””. (8) In section 94(1A) of that Act (appeal from within United Kingdom: unfounded claim) for ““or (e)”” substitute ““(e) or (ha)””.”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 48 [Procedure]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 678 c588-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Contracts Data protection Codes of practice Appeals Bail Asylum Detainees Applications Deportation British nationality Aircraft Employment Finance Families Human rights Enforcement Fixed penalties Eligibility Immigration controls Immigration Undocumented migrants Human trafficking Hong Kong Legal representation Entry clearances Legal opinion Immigration officers Private sector Pilot schemes National security Protection Monitoring Passengers Registration Terrorism Treaties Training Refugees Small businesses Right of search Temporary accommodation Students Detention centres British overseas citizenship
- Legislation
- Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:25:32 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_298490
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_298490
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_298490