Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].


Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]

Before my noble friend gives a final proper response—at least, I assume it will be—may I say briefly that I am grateful for the Minister’s comments and will reflect on them, although I continue to feel that there are some problems here? He is right that there is more than one ombudsman in the telecommunications sector, but I believe that he acknowledged that the DTI had also had a hand in that proposal, albeit with the DCMS alongside it. I should put on the record that I was aware of that, as are others. It would be putting it mildly to say that there are mixed views on the merits of that for consumers. I shall not add to that at this stage. The other point that I want to put firmly on record is that there is the most glaring disparity between what is envisaged here and what the Government have done in relation to financial services. I therefore hope that the Minister will reflect on what I have said, and on what the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, has said, too.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c80GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Consumers Billing Energy Functions Estate agents Gas and Electricity Consumer Council Protection Powers Location Post offices Office of Fair Trading Postal services National Consumer Council Standards Water supply Regulation Utilities Consumer Council for Water Consumer Council for Postal Services
Legislation
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk