Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from John Bercow (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.

Finance Bill

I well recall last year’s amendment tabled by the hon. Member for Nottingham, South (Alan Simpson) to which, if memory serves me correctly, I put my name. It seemed to me that its rejection was unjustified. Is it not safe to work on the assumption that if the Government did not think that their proposal will be environmentally effective they would not have introduced it, and that they therefore reckon that it will be effective? Given that, they should surely want to trumpet the fact on an annual basis for some years to come.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c214 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Companies Agriculture Age Conservation Combined heat and power Annuities Buildings Capital allowances Housing Investment Energy Electricity generation Insurance companies Industry Grants Inheritance tax Personal income Pensions Property Pension funds Sales Small businesses Tax allowances Renewable energy Tax avoidance Taxation Technology Tax rates and bands Self-employed Solar power Carbon emissions Stamp duty land tax Alternatively secured pensions Managed service companies
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk