Proceeding contribution from Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.

Finance Bill

The hon. Gentleman is right to say that the amendment applies to that specific part of the Bill. My point is that the Treasury should perhaps be looking to extend the provision further instead of disapplying it. Does the Treasury intend to respond to the concerns raised by deputy leadership candidates, and does it have any estimate of the extent to which SPVs are being used to minimise stamp duty land tax? I hope that it will look into that issue and perhaps address it in next year’s Finance Bill.

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 462 c247
Session: 2006-07
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Conditions of employment Companies Agriculture Age Conservation Combined heat and power Annuities Buildings Capital allowances Housing Investment Energy Electricity generation Insurance companies Industry Grants Inheritance tax Personal income Pensions Property Pension funds Sales Small businesses Tax allowances Renewable energy Tax avoidance Taxation Technology Tax rates and bands Self-employed Solar power Carbon emissions Stamp duty land tax Alternatively secured pensions Managed service companies
Legislation: Finance Bill 2006-07
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Finance Bill

Secondary information

Librarians' tools