Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Curry (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

There is a significant distinction between a debate on a national policy statement, which, by definition, is about a principle, and that about the positioning of a power station or a runway. If 45 decisions a year are to be made, will the entire membership of the commission hear the whole submission in every case, or will a handful of members perhaps chair sub-committees—instead of the entire commission, according to the Secretary of State's written statement of a couple of weeks ago, receiving representations from every member of the public who wishes to be heard?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
469 c31-2 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Accountability Aviation Conservation Climate change Airports Housing Finance Flood control Environment protection Energy Infrastructure Planning permission Planning Public participation Motorways Scotland Sewage Water supply Sustainable development Wales Renewable energy Taxation Wind power Sewers Trees Regional development agencies Carbon emissions National policy statements
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk