Proceeding contribution from Peter Luff (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
Does that mean that the Minister does not assume that all such statements will necessarily be considered by a brand new Committee and that other mechanisms might be available, in consultation with the Chairmen of those four other Committees, to ensure that the Government's legitimate expectations of increased parliamentary scrutiny are met, or are there no assumptions about the structure of scrutiny?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 469 c119
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Accountability Aviation Conservation Climate change Airports Housing Finance Flood control Environment protection Energy Infrastructure Planning permission Planning Public participation Motorways Scotland Sewage Water supply Sustainable development Wales Renewable energy Taxation Wind power Sewers Trees Regional development agencies Carbon emissions National policy statements
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:37:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428323
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428323
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428323