Proceeding contribution from John Healey (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
The discussions continue. My hon. Friend the Member for Hayes and Harlington conceded that there was a problem with the terminal 5 applications, partly because the developer was time-wasting and partly because objectors in the community were unfunded. The Bill and our arrangements will help with both. He gave a fair and important warning about trust in the system. Our aim is to strengthen that with the national planning policy statements before the House and the planning process in the Bill. The hon. Member for North Cornwall (Dan Rogerson) asked about class orders—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 469 c122
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Accountability Aviation Conservation Climate change Airports Housing Finance Flood control Environment protection Energy Infrastructure Planning permission Planning Public participation Motorways Scotland Sewage Water supply Sustainable development Wales Renewable energy Taxation Wind power Sewers Trees Regional development agencies Carbon emissions National policy statements
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:37:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428334
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428334
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428334