Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 April 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill.

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Lord. We—that is to say, the Opposition Front Bench—have not tabled an amendment on the specific point. Our preference would be for a much shorter period but renewable. That would give the court flexibility to deal with both the procedural and the evidential problems. I do not know whether the Minister would be prepared to respond to this, but I would like to think that he will look at this matter before Third Reading. As I said, it is a practical point and one that I think has some substance.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
700 c1590 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Crime Asylum Armed forces Crimes of violence Deportation Army Anti-social behaviour Civil proceedings Devolution Court orders Air force Custodial treatment Hospitals Industrial relations Families Evidence Human rights Inspections Health professions Hospices Misconduct Offenders NHS Parents Police Prisons Newspaper press Police authorities Navy Mental health Anti-social behaviour orders Scotland Young people Young offenders Security Strikes HM Prison Service Hijacking Local safeguarding children boards
Legislation
Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk