Proceeding contribution from Earl of Onslow (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 April 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill.
Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill
My Lords, will the Minister enlighten me on something that I am beginning not to understand? Let us say that an interim order is applied for. Presumably this is like prima facie evidence; they think it is needed. Is it possible for them to say, ““Actually, we didn’t need this because the tittle-tattle that we have is not good enough””? Can the order lapse and be found to be unnecessary? I am in a slight muddle and groping for information.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 700 c1590
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Criminal proceedings Crime Asylum Armed forces Crimes of violence Deportation Army Anti-social behaviour Civil proceedings Devolution Court orders Air force Custodial treatment Hospitals Industrial relations Families Evidence Human rights Inspections Health professions Hospices Misconduct Offenders NHS Parents Police Prisons Newspaper press Police authorities Navy Mental health Anti-social behaviour orders Scotland Young people Young offenders Security Strikes HM Prison Service Hijacking Local safeguarding children boards
- Legislation
- Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-07-09 22:01:56 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_465551
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_465551
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_465551