Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Geoffrey Clifton-Brown (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 2 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.

Planning Bill

What we are discussing is one of the most controversial aspects of the Bill in relation to air travel, and it would be useful to have it clarified. To understand how these amendments and clauses work, may I ask whether, in future, that extra runway at Stansted—to take the Minister's example—would already have been subject to an examination in respect of a national policy statement? In other words, will the infrastructure planning commission operate in a climate in which a national policy statement will already say whether there should be another runway at Heathrow, Stansted, Gatwick or wherever?

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
476 c516 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Compulsory purchase Construction Coastal areas Climate change Crown lands and estates Common land Airports Land Licensing Environment protection Infrastructure Land use Isles of Scilly Local government Planning authorities Planning permission Planning Ports Natural gas Railways Parliamentary scrutiny National Trust Scotland Storage Sustainable development Wales Roads Rights of way Electromagnetic fields Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk