Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
I will deal first with the Treasury point. The answer to the noble Viscount, Lord Eccles, is exactly the same as the answer we gave in our previous discussion. Modern advice from parliamentary counsel on legislation is that we do not need to specify the Treasury on the face of the Bill, because that is implicit in the whole business of accountability.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c144GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Compensation Community development Companies Compulsory purchase Anti-social behaviour Council housing Commission for the New Towns Housing Finance Land Freedom of information Health hazards Electricity Housing associations Hazardous substances Housing Corporation English Partnerships Landlord and tenant Electric cables Evictions Local government Planning Listed buildings New towns Water supply Wales Social rented housing Roads Tenants Rented housing Sewers Regeneration Leukaemia Homes and Communities Agency
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:31:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480042
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480042
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480042