Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Housing and Regeneration Bill.
Housing and Regeneration Bill
No, I accept the principle that I said I accepted. However, I would not accept a principle that included an element of retrospectivity and tweaked it by being reasonable when one came to it. In the commercial world—there are large amounts of money and big commercial interests here as well as everything else; they are all for community benefit, but they are big interests—you would not have an agreement that said, ““A reasonable amount will be repaid at the end of the day””.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 702 c172GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Compensation Community development Companies Compulsory purchase Anti-social behaviour Council housing Commission for the New Towns Housing Finance Land Freedom of information Health hazards Electricity Housing associations Hazardous substances Housing Corporation English Partnerships Landlord and tenant Electric cables Evictions Local government Planning Listed buildings New towns Water supply Wales Social rented housing Roads Tenants Rented housing Sewers Regeneration Leukaemia Homes and Communities Agency
- Legislation
- Housing and Regeneration Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:35:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480095
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480095
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_480095