Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

When Drax said that it was intending to use 10 per cent of biomass, it accompanied that with an announcement that most of it would have to come from Scandinavia or somewhere like that. That raises severe practical questions, of not only the economic cost but the CO2 cost of transporting biomass over a large area. My question about the amendment is not with the spirit in which it was moved—I am all in favour of biomass, and my house in Scotland has been heated by a wood-burning stove cheaply, effectively and successfully for many years—but there are practicalities which putting a precise figure on does not take account of.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c616GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Conservation Combined heat and power Consumption Carbon dioxide Biofuels Coal fired power stations Licensing Energy Electricity generation Ofgem EU emissions trading scheme Natural gas Prices Lighting Microgeneration Standards Renewable energy Taxation Carbon emissions Geothermal power Hydroelectric power Greenhouse gas emissions
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk