Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

I am not sure about delight. It is certainly not euphoria. I am slightly disappointed with the Minister’s reply because we are talking about only a capability. I take on board the point that the market might see it as a 10 per cent target. However, we are missing an opportunity if we do not discuss this with the planners to ensure that the capability is in place for a small target of biomass, considering a number of options that would have to be considered if biomass were introduced at a later date. If the ability for dealing with biomass was included in the planning process and thought out beforehand, stations would not have to be redesigned. That would be more acceptable than if the Government—as they probably will—introduce biomass targets in the future. I take on board the Minister’s point that all coal-fired power stations have the ability to fire biomass. The issue that I have is that, as with carbon storage and capture, we have to have the ability and the space to handle this type of fuel source. I am slightly disappointed, but, on that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c617GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Conservation Combined heat and power Consumption Carbon dioxide Biofuels Coal fired power stations Licensing Energy Electricity generation Ofgem EU emissions trading scheme Natural gas Prices Lighting Microgeneration Standards Renewable energy Taxation Carbon emissions Geothermal power Hydroelectric power Greenhouse gas emissions
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk