Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

Perhaps I should have continued my story. Due to the difficulty that I had, I introduced the Renewable Energy Bill to this House, which then became the basis for the climate change Bill, a Private Member’s Bill that went through the other place. On the basis of that, the removal of the planning constraints on microgeneration came forward. I am well aware of all that, and I cannot give the Government credit for it. But on that basis, I realise how long these processes take. The Government are saying, ““We need to review this and then we can go forward””. Anyone who has been involved in these processes realises that it takes forever and that the bureaucracy is a nightmare. Therefore, of course I will take on board what is said by the review that is published this week, but I do not see why we could not act as a lead on this and why we could not go forward—we will adopt it anyway, because we have to try to meet our 2020 targets. The view of the noble Lord, Lord Jenkin, on renewable generation is somewhat different from the Government’s. Therefore, I hope that the Government will change their mind. I will bring this back at a later stage. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c642-3GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Conservation Combined heat and power Consumption Carbon dioxide Biofuels Coal fired power stations Licensing Energy Electricity generation Ofgem EU emissions trading scheme Natural gas Prices Lighting Microgeneration Standards Renewable energy Taxation Carbon emissions Geothermal power Hydroelectric power Greenhouse gas emissions
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk