Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Puttnam (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 June 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

I would like a moment to correct the record. The noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, can defend himself, but it is wrong of the Minister to claim from the Dispatch Box that we are reversing the order of the principal objectives and responsibilities of Ofgem. That was not the intention of the noble Lord, Lord Oxburgh, nor do I believe for one moment that it is the intention of the Conservative Front Bench. This is to do with co-equal principal objectives. There is no reason why there should not be more than one principal objective. I spent a great deal of time on the Bill relating to Ofcom, which has a number of principal objectives. The idea that somehow you have to swap one for another is quite wrong, and it did not do justice to the Conservative Front Bench.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c653GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Conservation Combined heat and power Consumption Carbon dioxide Biofuels Coal fired power stations Licensing Energy Electricity generation Ofgem EU emissions trading scheme Natural gas Prices Lighting Microgeneration Standards Renewable energy Taxation Carbon emissions Geothermal power Hydroelectric power Greenhouse gas emissions
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk