Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Palmer (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 July 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

The noble Lord, Lord Teverson, made many extremely good points. One or two things about the amendment slightly worry me. Having just put in an eco carbon-based system in my house in the Borders of Scotland, I am still slightly fussed about the muddled thinking that there is on what carbon saving is and what the right thing to do is. Perhaps we need a little more explanation on the right thing for the right house. Obviously, on a new build, one would have to go through the pros and cons of a geothermal basis or an air source pump. I am slightly worried that we all should be much better educated on the right thing to do in the right zero-carbon situation. On the whole, this amendment makes enormous sense. I agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Carnegy. Certainly, living in the type of house that I live in, one needs the odd draught to keep the air circulating throughout. By and large, I support this amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c4GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Disadvantaged Costs Conservation Buildings Billing Housing Licensing Health hazards EU law Energy Electricity Fuel poverty Electric cables Natural gas Mergers Meters Standards Technology Takeovers Carbon emissions Social tariffs
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk