Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 July 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.


Energy Bill

I never thought that I would agree with the noble Lord, Lord Redesdale, as much as I just have. We must set our face firmly against commercial protectionism, but where the objective is a political one it must be resisted. Noble Lords may be aware that when we debated these subjects a little over a year ago, the noble Lord, Lord Truscott, was replying for the Government. There were rumours in the press that Gazprom was threatening to bid for Centrica, which includes British Gas, among other things. I am not sure that I got a clear enough answer, but I made it clear to the Government that that would be totally unacceptable. There could be no reciprocity or transparency of any kind; that must be firmly resisted. That is quite different from the proposals of the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam. Mischievously, I ask him what his view was when the Government chose to sell Westinghouse to the Japanese.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
703 c52-3GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Disadvantaged Costs Conservation Buildings Billing Housing Licensing Health hazards EU law Energy Electricity Fuel poverty Electric cables Natural gas Mergers Meters Standards Technology Takeovers Carbon emissions Social tariffs
Legislation
Energy Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk