Proceeding contribution from Lord Elton (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 July 2008. It occurred during Ministerial statement on G8: 2008 Summit.
G8: 2008 Summit
My Lords, most of us would endorse the sentiments of the noble Lord, Lord Elystan-Morgan, with regard to the handling of the Zimbabwe issue. On a narrower aspect of its effectiveness, 14 is a surprisingly small number of people. I presume that it cannot include the dependants and spouses of the people listed. It has been suggested that most of them will long ago have transferred most of their wealth to their spouses and dependants, who are freely spending it abroad on their behalf and on their own benefits. Can the proscription, if that is the word, be extended to them? Otherwise, it will not be effective.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 703 c865
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conservation Climate change Developing countries Africa Health services Human rights Energy International assistance Food G8 International Monetary Fund Oil Nuclear power Politics and government Prices Renewable energy Trade agreements UN resolutions Sanctions Zimbabwe World economy
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:42:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_491577
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_491577
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_491577