Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.

Planning Bill

Before the Minister moves on, the part that puzzles me is her reference to something like ““highway required for the project to be able to function””. I understand that a road extension or whatever may be needed for the project to function, but should that not be part of the original application? One reason why I am concerned about this is the danger, if it is not included in the original application, of consultation on it not being adequate because people will not have their minds directed to it.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c948 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Devolved matters Appeals Compulsory purchase Conservation Carbon dioxide Common land Brownfield sites Allotments Contamination Housing Fees and charges Land Health hazards Electricity generation Infrastructure Exemptions Farms Inland waterways Green belt Electric cables Farmers Local government Ministerial powers Powers of entry Planning permission Nuisance Planning Ports Nuclear power Power stations Publicity Listed buildings Parliamentary scrutiny National Trust London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Scotland Water Transport Storage Wales Rights of way Rural areas Second homes Trees Regional development agencies Regional government Tree preservation orders Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Statutory instruments
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk