Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.

Planning Bill

I, too, will study what the noble Baroness has said. She agreed with my points, which has led me to the conclusion that highways, to take one example, would be part of the original application, so I do not see that it is associated development. However, I think we can pursue this outside the Chamber if I am still getting it wrong. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 338 not moved.] Clause 111 agreed to. Clause 112 [Reasons for decision to grant or refuse development consent]: [Amendments Nos. 339 to 341 not moved.] Clause 112 agreed to. Clause 113 [Orders granting development consent: formalities]: [Amendments Nos. 342 and 343 not moved.]

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
704 c950 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Devolved matters Appeals Compulsory purchase Conservation Carbon dioxide Common land Brownfield sites Allotments Contamination Housing Fees and charges Land Health hazards Electricity generation Infrastructure Exemptions Farms Inland waterways Green belt Electric cables Farmers Local government Ministerial powers Powers of entry Planning permission Nuisance Planning Ports Nuclear power Power stations Publicity Listed buildings Parliamentary scrutiny National Trust London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Scotland Water Transport Storage Wales Rights of way Rural areas Second homes Trees Regional development agencies Regional government Tree preservation orders Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Statutory instruments
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk