Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Liverpool (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
An exception is stated explicitly in Clause 101(3). It is difficult to understand what the grounds for those exceptions are. I am simply asking for some clarification about the exception granted to the national policy statement and therefore to the Infrastructure Planning Commission.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c975
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Devolved matters Appeals Compulsory purchase Conservation Carbon dioxide Common land Brownfield sites Allotments Contamination Housing Fees and charges Land Health hazards Electricity generation Infrastructure Exemptions Farms Inland waterways Green belt Electric cables Farmers Local government Ministerial powers Powers of entry Planning permission Nuisance Planning Ports Nuclear power Power stations Publicity Listed buildings Parliamentary scrutiny National Trust London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Scotland Water Transport Storage Wales Rights of way Rural areas Second homes Trees Regional development agencies Regional government Tree preservation orders Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:48:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501668
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501668
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501668