Proceeding contribution from Earl of Caithness (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 October 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
I come back again because there is another point that the Minister has not answered. It is whether Clause 118 changes the presumption about compulsory purchase in the way that I suggested when I spoke to my amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 704 c977
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Compensation Devolved matters Appeals Compulsory purchase Conservation Carbon dioxide Common land Brownfield sites Allotments Contamination Housing Fees and charges Land Health hazards Electricity generation Infrastructure Exemptions Farms Inland waterways Green belt Electric cables Farmers Local government Ministerial powers Powers of entry Planning permission Nuisance Planning Ports Nuclear power Power stations Publicity Listed buildings Parliamentary scrutiny National Trust London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Scotland Water Transport Storage Wales Rights of way Rural areas Second homes Trees Regional development agencies Regional government Tree preservation orders Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Statutory instruments
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:48:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501675
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501675
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_501675