Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Caithness (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.

Planning Bill

moved Amendment No. 136D: 136D: Clause 203, page 117, line 40, at end insert— ““( ) For the purposes of subsection (6)(f) the regulations may provide, or permit or require provision for differential rates in respect of developments which renew or replace existing buildings, and which do not incur any significant costs to provide infrastructure to support the development.”” The noble Earl said: My Lords, I must confess that I am still confused about what happened on charities. Was the Minister’s amendment agreed? Is she going to alter it? It looks that way, but some of us got left behind on that.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c774 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Appeals Charities Compulsory purchase Climate change Buildings Common land Airports Design Delegated legislation Brownfield sites Housing Fees and charges Land Liability Infrastructure Exemptions Farms Housing associations Land use Gardens Local government Planning permission Nuisance Planning Power stations Railways Parliamentary scrutiny Noise Parks Parliamentary privilege Standards Transport Sustainable development Social rented housing Roads Wind power Urban areas Regional spatial strategies Planning gain supplement Infrastructure Planning Commission Community infrastructure levy
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk