Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Ian Pearson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

I understand that the hon. Gentleman takes a very close interest in how Parliament works, its traditions and the way in which its powers are exercised, and I also take that seriously. I would not want to be supporting a blunderbuss clause that just gives the Government the power to do anything they want if they decide that that is the right thing to do. That is why we have spent a lot of time ensuring we get the limitations imposed on clause 72 right. I believe this is now appropriate, and I hope I explained in Committee why that is the case. I also hope that the assurances I have given, particularly on the safeguards in both primary and secondary legislation, will give further reassurance to those outside stakeholders who are very interested in this part of the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
483 c839-40 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Consumers Directors Assets Debts Bank services Banks Credit unions Building societies Capital Deposits Finance Liability Financial services Financial institutions Exemptions Insolvency Government assistance Financial Services Authority Private sector Protection Pay Property transfer Public sector Publicity Mutual societies Nationalisation Shares Treasury Henry VIII clauses Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk