Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Myners (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 January 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

It would be unwise for me to go further in that regard. Should it ever become necessary for the courts to give that degree of precision, the word ““reasonably”” would certainly take one in the direction in which the noble Lord is encouraging me to go—but I would rather not go any further than I have. Given that a test of reasonable likelihood for the second test provides the right level of reassurance to interested parties that voluntary or regulatory action can no longer be relied upon to resolve matters, while increasing the prospect of a substantial resolution, I therefore hope that this explanation will be sufficient to induce the noble Baroness to withdraw her amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
706 c1203 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Codes of practice Accountability Administration Assets Bank services Banks Credit unions Building societies Bank of England Deposits Financial institutions Insolvency Legislation Government assistance Financial Services Authority Financial markets Foreign companies Protection Public sector Public expenditure Nationalisation Terrorism Regulation Shareholders Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Northern Rock Freezing of assets
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk