Proceeding contribution from Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 January 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Banking Bill.
Banking Bill
The Minister has demonstrated the point that I made at the beginning of my intervention. His definition of ““reasonably”” is not the common person’s definition. The common definition of ““reasonably”” is that it is reasonable—it is moderately likely. It is not that ““by using one’s reason one can come to only one conclusion””. That strengthens the argument for this amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 706 c1203
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Accountability Administration Assets Bank services Banks Credit unions Building societies Bank of England Deposits Financial institutions Insolvency Legislation Government assistance Financial Services Authority Financial markets Foreign companies Protection Public sector Public expenditure Nationalisation Terrorism Regulation Shareholders Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme Northern Rock Freezing of assets
- Legislation
- Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-27 13:48:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517824
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517824
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_517824