Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 January 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Banking Bill.
Banking Bill
I have explained that it is because the 1998 Act specifies the report of one of the sub-committees and we now have an even more important sub-committee—a much more important sub-committee of the court than the independent committee of directors could ever be—and yet there is no specific reporting requirement. I would like to test the opinion of the Committee. Division on Amendment 197. Contents 10; Not-Contents 31. Amendment 197 disagreed. Clause 228 agreed.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 707 c131
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Compensation Codes of practice Audit Assets Debts Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Bank of England Bank notes Deposits Credit rating Housing Finance Fees and charges Liability EU law Investment Financial institutions Insolvency European communities Government assistance Financial Services Authority Financial markets Foreign companies Private sector Membership Public expenditure Property Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Post offices Monetary policy Statistics Regulation Stocks and shares Valuation Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme National Loans Fund Northern Rock Financial Stability Committee Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 18:54:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522728
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522728
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_522728