Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Welfare Reform Bill.
Welfare Reform Bill
Yes, I think that, if a direction is made, the individual complies and comes to the next work-focused interview, there is a recap on how the action plan is proceeding and then another direction, which would be relevant from then on in. Therefore, I think that it would technically supersede the earlier direction. It would not be ripped up in a sense, because the direction would stand; it would have been complied with and action would have been taken in relation to it—then you would move on to other barriers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 711 c299GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disability Contracts Childcare Benefits rules Age Advisory services Childminding ME/CFS Diagnosis Employment Jobcentres Interviews Jobcentre Plus General practitioners Learning disability Medical examinations Private sector Pensioners Parents Poverty Staff Part-time employment Lone parents Social security Social security benefits Standards Voluntary organisations Training Unemployed people Voluntary work Employment and support allowance
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:22:16 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568402
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568402
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_568402