Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Thursday, 18 June 2009, in the House of Lords.
Welfare Reform Bill
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 711 c287-342GC
- Session
- 2008-09
- Department
- Department for Work and Pensions
- Legislative stage
- Committee stage
- Procedure
- New clauses
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Related items
-
Welfare Reform Bill. Brought from the Commons. Explanatory Notes HL Bill 32-EN also published.
Wednesday, 18 March 2009
Bills
House of Lords
- Proceeding contributions
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c336GC (Link to this contribution) Clearly, the Secretary of State and the department need to know what is going on, but it is not for ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c332GC (Link to this contribution) My immediate response to that is that the noble Lord’s second proposition is probably the one that r...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c339-40GC (Link to this contribution) Debate on whether Clause 2 should stand part of the Bill. Before we leave Clause 2, it is worth ta...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c292GC (Link to this contribution) I detect a soapy mirror for reflection. I do not think that that was a very good example and it does...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c319GC (Link to this contribution) Despite the fact that the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, has decided to not to move the amendment, an...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c323GC (Link to this contribution) Does that not make the participatory nature of decision-making rather complex? Is the decision made ...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c326GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that elucidation, which is really what I wanted to hear. I thought that it was not...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c324GC (Link to this contribution) If the noble Baroness will forgive me, her amendment states, ""may not require part-time working"." ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c299GC (Link to this contribution) Yes, I think that, if a direction is made, the individual complies and comes to the next work-focuse...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c314GC (Link to this contribution) She was examined by a doctor.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c336GC (Link to this contribution) I reiterate that we would not want to end up with a situation where we contract with a prime contrac...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c335-6GC (Link to this contribution) The last thing that I would ever want to do would be to create more ambiguity than is already contai...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c335GC (Link to this contribution) I think that it would generally be the case that the Minister is responsible for the activities of t...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c330GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful that there will be specific help, but my question was: what if they do not delive...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 711 c329GC (Link to this contribution) We on these Benches share the suspicions, as the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, put it so well, and t...
-
Baroness Meacher | 711 c328-9GC (Link to this contribution) I am very suspicious of the contracting-out model with this sort of work. I understand that the fina...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c339GC (Link to this contribution) It was before my time.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c340-1GC (Link to this contribution) The surest and most sustainable way to address child poverty is to support more parents into work, w...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 711 c341GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 71 71: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— "Work-related activity: additiona...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c338GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 63 63: Clause 2, page 8, line 30, leave out "criminal" and insert "court"
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c339GC (Link to this contribution) I have made this point before: the fact that the department has always done this does not necessaril...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c298GC (Link to this contribution) I said that there would be a succession of directions, but that at any one time there would be only ...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c298GC (Link to this contribution) Very often women with children who do not know English face several barriers at the same time. I am ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c297GC (Link to this contribution) I hope that Hansard reporters have better hearing than me. I thought I heard the Minister talking ab...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c297GC (Link to this contribution) There may be several barriers to work. This direction-making power is to say that the adviser has th...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c287GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 2: Work-related activity: income support claimants and partners of claimants Amendment 44 4...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c287-8GC (Link to this contribution) Dealing with the noble Lord’s last point, about the references, I presume he means references to "un...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c288GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 45 45: Clause 2, page 6, line 13, after "an" insert ""individual"
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c292GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 46 46: Clause 2, page 6, line 21, at end insert "at the lower rate"
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c289-90GC (Link to this contribution) One follows the other, potentially, if the conditionality is not met. The infamous case studies were...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c289GC (Link to this contribution) Is it not like love and marriage—they go together?
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c291GC (Link to this contribution) If you are going to tailor the plan to an individual’s circumstances, which the Minister says that y...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c290GC (Link to this contribution) There could be an action plan for individual A, but it could cover only general issues and be used f...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c317GC (Link to this contribution) I think we are straining the contract terms and its construction, which is currently beyond my brief...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c317GC (Link to this contribution) I do not know if the Minister is about to leave the subject of Atos Healthcare and the computer-aide...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c316GC (Link to this contribution) Surely they should not have got to that point; it should have been recognised far earlier.
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c317GC (Link to this contribution) Does the Minister recall a bit of a scandal in the Midlands three or four years ago, when a doctor s...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c314GC (Link to this contribution) Sure. But I mean the DWP medical team uses a computer-aided assessment to make a final assessment of...
-
Baroness Meacher | 711 c319GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 57 57: Clause 2, page 7, line 9, at end insert— "( ) may not be in regard to the use of s...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c318GC (Link to this contribution) I am sorry, but I really must repeat my question for the third time. What is the situation on appeal...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c322GC (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to repeat what I always say, but it worries me that this distinction is not made. Women l...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c323-4GC (Link to this contribution) If a lone parent is in the progression-to-work group, with the youngest child aged three or four, th...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c324GC (Link to this contribution) I apologise for interrupting the noble Baroness. I think that is the same letter that the noble Lord...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c321-2GC (Link to this contribution) I was startled to see Amendment 58. The four activities that it seeks to rule out—independent job se...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c325GC (Link to this contribution) Could we perhaps say, "working in the voluntary sector"?
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c325GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord seemed to be in favour of part-time working for the progression-to-work group. Part-t...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c325GC (Link to this contribution) As I indicated when I responded initially, we do not want to be too prescriptive about what work-rel...
-
Lord Rix | 711 c299GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 54 54: Clause 2, page 7, line 5, at end insert— "( ) must be reasonable, having regard to...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c298GC (Link to this contribution) I think that we are getting somewhere. There will not be multiple directions, and I am delighted to ...
-
Baroness Turner of Camden | 711 c303GC (Link to this contribution) I, too, support this amendment. Although it is not within my particular area of expertise, I have li...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c309GC (Link to this contribution) I think we would all welcome an easy-read version of the Bill ourselves.
-
Lord Rix | 711 c309GC (Link to this contribution) Yes, that is true. I have said enough. The Minister has said a great deal and I do not want to add t...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c312GC (Link to this contribution) As a disability contact person in the department of politics at the University of York, I have found...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c309GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 55 55: Clause 2, page 7, line 5, at end insert— "( ) must be reasonable, having regard to...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c337GC (Link to this contribution) There seems to be an appetite for a letter. I would just say that we are not necessarily or particul...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c337GC (Link to this contribution) Send a letter.
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c337GC (Link to this contribution) It is one thing to have the availability; it is a totally different thing to have to need to use it ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c337GC (Link to this contribution) I am not sure that we are very far apart on this. We are seeking to achieve the right position: when...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c335GC (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, but is he saying that if a Minister is brought to the Dispatch...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c334-5GC (Link to this contribution) I am not being shy or coy. We have made it clear that we will have pathfinders, undertaken by extern...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 711 c332GC (Link to this contribution) On that point, will the Minister confirm that these contracts will be available for public inspectio...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c332GC (Link to this contribution) I think that the answer is yes. There would be complaints procedures in the contract that would have...
-
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay | 711 c332GC (Link to this contribution) Trying to scrutinise contracting-out arrangements of all sorts has been a great problem in many ways...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c332GC (Link to this contribution) If a claimant wanted to complain about a contractor, would they go to Jobcentre Plus to do that?
-
Baroness Turner of Camden | 711 c328GC (Link to this contribution) I have some difficulty with these amendments, except for the clause stand part. My noble friend will...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 711 c342GC (Link to this contribution) I would not wish to retable them on Report.
-
Baroness Crawley | 711 c342GC (Link to this contribution) This may be a convenient moment for the Committee to adjourn until Monday at 3.30 pm.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c342GC (Link to this contribution) Is it possible under the rules for the noble Baroness simply to retable the amendments so that we ca...
-
Lord Colwyn | 711 c342GC (Link to this contribution) The Committee stands adjourned until Monday at 3.30 pm.
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c339GC (Link to this contribution) It was before mine too, I can assure the noble Lord. I do not apologise for raising this matter. I a...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c338GC (Link to this contribution) This is a simple probing amendment. On the previous amendment my argument rested in part on new subs...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c338-9GC (Link to this contribution) New Section 2G would allow contracted organisations, where appropriate, to deliver work-related cond...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c295-6GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, as part of the progression-to-work pathfinders, parents with younger children and those cl...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c297GC (Link to this contribution) Again, I am grateful to the Minister. The individual action plans, as I think we both agree, could c...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c297GC (Link to this contribution) That is a good example. I do not see why that could not be the case. The might be other issues aroun...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c298GC (Link to this contribution) I think that that is helpful. I was going on to say that I also picked up that the Minister said tha...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c297GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps the learning of English would be a key barrier. Would that be a good example?
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c287GC (Link to this contribution) I wonder whether it is only me who thinks that it is perhaps appropriate that on the fourth day of C...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c288GC (Link to this contribution) Certainly I will withdraw my amendment. I was interested to hear the Minister say that not everythin...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c288GC (Link to this contribution) If the noble Lord leaves me with that thought I will see whether we can produce some data.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c293GC (Link to this contribution) These provisions generally deal with recipients of income support or with partners of certain recipi...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c292-3GC (Link to this contribution) Given that social security laws are viewed with great suspicion outside the two Houses of Parliament...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c291-2GC (Link to this contribution) True, we do not a difference in view, but what we have is a piece of legislation that I do not belie...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c288-9GC (Link to this contribution) This is rather different. I may have got myself into a muddle thinking about the two rates of employ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c291GC (Link to this contribution) If we are to discuss the matter at a subsequent stage that is probably the best time to do so, and I...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c317GC (Link to this contribution) I sincerely hope that that is never a contract term, but I would need to get formal advice that it i...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c317GC (Link to this contribution) I would like to see the paying of bonuses expressly banned in the contract.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c315-6GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Countess for these amendments. She raises again an important issue that she has ca...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c316-7GC (Link to this contribution) Indeed, the purpose of the process is to identify and bag up these issues right at the start of the ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c318GC (Link to this contribution) I had not quite finished. The department is currently carrying out a review of the work-capability a...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c320GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 58 58: Clause 2, page 7, line 9, at end insert— "( ) may not require independent job sear...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c319GC (Link to this contribution) I have just heard the noble Baroness, Lady Hollis, say that 60 per cent are successful. I am gratef...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c318GC (Link to this contribution) I do not have those data to hand. They are not in the Box. I will have a look and write to the noble...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c324GC (Link to this contribution) I have just received a letter from a mother who is on income support and has an 11 month-old son. Sh...
-
Baroness Meacher | 711 c322GC (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment to the extent that I, too, am bewildered about conflating these two complete...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c325GC (Link to this contribution) Anything but "undertaking voluntary work". Anyway, I shall read what the Minister has said.
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c325GC (Link to this contribution) That is something that we can all agree on. If it is all by agreement, I have no problem with any of...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c326GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 60 60: Clause 2, page 7, line 15, after first "of," insert "or contractors to,"
-
Lord Rix | 711 c299-301GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak also to Amendments 89 and 92. I am joined in their support by the noble Baroness, Lady...
-
Baroness Murphy | 711 c302-3GC (Link to this contribution) The amendment has been so ably moved that I do not need to add much more than my tuppenceworth. I su...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c303GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness, Lady Thomas, mentioned horticulture. Perhaps I may also mention the fact that a ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c307-8GC (Link to this contribution) I readily recognise the challenge involved in that. If we are dealing with ESA customers, there is a...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c306GC (Link to this contribution) What provisions are there for recognising certain disabilities, particularly mental disability, amon...
-
Lord Rix | 711 c308-9GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in support of the amendment, and to my noble friend...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c309-11GC (Link to this contribution) I shall also speak to Amendments 90 and 93. In doing so, I declare a non-pecuniary interest as chair...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c314GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister may recall that this subject has come up on numerous occasions at Question Time, and I ...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 711 c313-4GC (Link to this contribution) Like other queries that have been thrown at my noble friend over the past few Committee days, this i...
-
Baroness Murphy | 711 c313GC (Link to this contribution) I have an extra question for the Minister. I was struck, as always, by the noble Countess, Lady Mar,...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c314GC (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister responds to this short debate, perhaps I might be allowed a supplementary. I men...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c336-7GC (Link to this contribution) That is the point that I was making. I was saying that of course the Secretary of State needs knowle...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c336GC (Link to this contribution) It may not be a question of direction, but I would have thought that, in any contract negotiations, ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c334GC (Link to this contribution) Have we wasted our time in the past three and three-quarter days? Surely the whole point of this is ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c333-4GC (Link to this contribution) There is a difference between "expects" in terms of "is required to" and "may". We are simply provid...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c333GC (Link to this contribution) Parliament does expect, and the Government expect, that these functions will be contracted out, so I...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c332-3GC (Link to this contribution) I see the thrust of the noble Lord’s point. I should like to reflect on that to see what would routi...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c330-2GC (Link to this contribution) I was coming to that. I will respond in detail to the letter that the noble Baroness has sent to me....
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c329-30GC (Link to this contribution) This group of amendments allows us to debate the Government’s approach to contracting with the publi...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c326-8GC (Link to this contribution) This is alarming group of amendments: Amendments 60, 61, 64, 65, 151 to 153, 155 and 155A; it is als...
-
Baroness Afshar | 711 c329GC (Link to this contribution) The existing private companies do not deliver. I sent a letter from a teacher to the Minister who wa...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c328GC (Link to this contribution) I, too, support the amendment—particularly what the noble Baroness, Lady Turner, said. This is a del...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 711 c342GC (Link to this contribution) We could simply have them as the first item on the next day’s business. They change the topic to fin...
-
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 711 c342GC (Link to this contribution) There is some difficulty. I do not know what time the Committee is proposing to finish. If it is pro...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c338GC (Link to this contribution) That has very little to do with what I was saying, which was about a relationship between the two se...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c297GC (Link to this contribution) That does not mean that you cannot have a succession of directions picking up different components o...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c288GC (Link to this contribution) In that case I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 44 withdrawn.
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c291GC (Link to this contribution) I am certainly happy to reflect on that. I genuinely think that it is unnecessary, however. I do not...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c292GC (Link to this contribution) We have probably almost beaten this one to death. However, I draw the noble Lord’s attention to new ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c294GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 52 52: Clause 2, page 6, line 45, leave out "only"
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c294GC (Link to this contribution) I would not even have considered putting down this amendment, but for the fact that new Section 2E (...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c294-5GC (Link to this contribution) That dispenses with new Section 2E of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and we move on to ...
-
Baroness Thomas of Walliswood | 711 c290GC (Link to this contribution) I am extremely confused. What on earth is the difference between a personalised action plan and an i...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c289GC (Link to this contribution) I hope to persuade the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, and the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas, that it i...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c289GC (Link to this contribution) This may well be the shortest speech that I shall make in Committee, but this is an extremely good a...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c291GC (Link to this contribution) The phrase "holes and digging" sprang into my mind as the Minister went through his brief. The Minis...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c320GC (Link to this contribution) I apologise for detaining the Committee even for these five minutes, but I thought I should draw thi...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c319-20GC (Link to this contribution) I understand that, but had I not been handed the letter, in only the past 10 minutes or so, I would ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c320GC (Link to this contribution) As the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, said, we have ranged over this issue extensively. If the noble ...
-
Baroness Meacher | 711 c319GC (Link to this contribution) I did not move the amendment because I felt that we had rehearsed the arguments in relation to it fu...
-
Countess of Mar | 711 c322GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, said something to the effect that claimants should not require pe...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c323GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I can deal with the last point first. The suggestion that mothers cannot effectively be full...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c320-1GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 58 is intended to probe the Government’s intentions as to what claimants are expected to d...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c325GC (Link to this contribution) To be absolutely clear, there can be no requirement imposed upon an individual in the progression-to...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c324GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the support I have had from the noble Baronesses, Lady Afshar and Lady Meacher. Th...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c299GC (Link to this contribution) I think that you could use the legal term, "spent", which I think is what the Minister means. That h...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c298GC (Link to this contribution) I note the point that the noble Baroness has pressed on a number of occasions. We may in part be tal...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c301-2GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, has given me permission to come in at this point to allow him to ca...
-
Lord Ramsbotham | 711 c302GC (Link to this contribution) I apologise to the Committee for being absent at the very start of the debate, but I am also involve...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c305-6GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord, Lord Rix, for moving his amendment. It brings us to an important topic that ...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c303-5GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Rix, will be glad to hear that this is an occasion when I will not be a bit of ...
-
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 711 c306GC (Link to this contribution) The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health was involved in the development of the Jobcentre Plus adviser...
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c306GC (Link to this contribution) Has the Minister asked Mencap specifically for help in training advisers?
-
Baroness Thomas of Winchester | 711 c311-2GC (Link to this contribution) We are assured at every turn that those with fluctuating health conditions, such as ME, MS, rheumato...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 711 c312-3GC (Link to this contribution) I am going to have to put my slightly provocative hat on. It occurs to me that the worse the level o...
- Subjects
- Disability Contracts Childcare Benefits rules Age Advisory services Childminding ME/CFS Diagnosis Employment Jobcentres Interviews Jobcentre Plus General practitioners Learning disability Medical examinations Private sector Pensioners Parents Poverty Staff Part-time employment Lone parents Social security Social security benefits Standards Voluntary organisations Training Unemployed people Voluntary work Employment and support allowance
- Legislation
- Welfare Reform Bill 2008-09
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (154)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-02-08 19:22:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_78381
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_78381
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_78381