Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 25 November 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Railways: Investment.


Railways: Investment

I thank the Minister for his courteous replies, but is he aware that in our Welsh folklore there is the story of the dictionary that, under ““Wales””, states: ““For ‘Wales’, read ‘England’””? Is there not a danger here that Wales will be short-changed—just as we were, for example, when at the time of the introduction of HSTs we were given only the hand-me-downs from the east coast main line? Why is more work needed in Wales on this matter, not in the north-west? When the Minister refers to the discussions within the Welsh Assembly Government, does that not mean in effect that the aim of the Government is to force the Welsh Assembly Government, at a time when their resources are being limited, to pick up a substantial part of the bill for the electrification of the line to south Wales?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
722 c1228 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Elizabeth line Birmingham Fares Finance Greater London King's Cross Station High speed trains East Coast main line Procurement Railways Rapid transit systems Nottingham London Underground Network Rail Wales Underground railways Sheffield Electrification Rolling stock Tyne and Wear North West Thameslink line Yorkshire and the Humber Great Western main line Midland main line Intercity Express Programme Review Agility Trains London Bridge Station Gatwick Airport Station Reading Station Birmingham New Street Station
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk