Proceeding contribution from Jim Murphy (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
I cannot help the fact that the hon. Gentleman is confused; that is for him to resolve. The point is that, as part of the Boyce review, we are committed to increasing some of those payments. He calls it righteous indignation, and I do not know whether that is his attempt to justify the policy that his Government are implementing, but I do not think that it is righteous indignation to say that, if someone at this very moment serving in Afghanistan finds themselves in harm's way, their wife, at home with their children, should reasonably expect decent support.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 521 c62
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Discipline Courts Armed forces Crimes of violence Army British overseas territories Air force Coroners Housing Health Education Equipment Leave Private education Pensions Prisoners Military police Navy Mental health Schools Training Sexual offences Sexual offences prevention orders Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill Post-traumatic stress disorder Chief Coroner Veterans
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:51:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_698021
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_698021
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_698021