Proceeding contribution from Daniel Byles (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
I entirely endorse my hon. Friend's concern about soldiers who come back not as part of formed units. Does he agree that that points to a wider issue with the military covenant, whereby it is not simply a covenant between the Government and our armed forces but between the nation and our armed forces? Although there is talk of putting the Government's side of this bargain into law, the issue is also about an attitude in our nation as a whole. For example, many of our public sector bodies have policies whereby members of staff can have up to 14 days off work to be a school governor or to undertake trade union activity, yet many of those organisations, particularly NHS trusts, do not give similar time off to members of the reserve forces.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 521 c67-8
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Discipline Courts Armed forces Crimes of violence Army British overseas territories Air force Coroners Housing Health Education Equipment Leave Private education Pensions Prisoners Military police Navy Mental health Schools Training Sexual offences Sexual offences prevention orders Select Committee on the Armed Forces Bill Post-traumatic stress disorder Chief Coroner Veterans
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:51:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_698036
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_698036
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_698036