Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Best (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

I am willing to withdraw the amendment but I am not entirely reassured. The removal of rights implies that the people moving in believe themselves to have earned new rights—the right to enfranchise and make capital gains—which is entirely contrary to the position that they in reality face. They know that they are entering this scheme, acquiring an affordable home that they could never possibly afford otherwise, and the terms are that they will not gain from the capital growth in the value of the property. That is a very fair deal for them to be part of, and I do not think that it is a removal of rights to say that they cannot enfranchise thereafter. It is a willingly-entered-into arrangement. So, although at this late hour I am very happy to withdraw this amendment, I am not entirely reassured by the noble Earl’s reply, for which I am grateful, as I am for the support from the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie. Amendment 82 withdrawn. Amendment 83 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c363-4 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Conservation Annual reports Council housing Housing benefit Finance Greater London Energy Housing associations Housing improvement Landlord and tenant Local government Powers Property transfer Private rented housing Overcrowding Standards Sales Social rented housing Repairs and maintenance Tenants' rights Rents Rural areas Regeneration Right to buy scheme Housing revenue accounts Homes and Communities Agency Tenant Services Authority Housing Ombudsman Service Community land trusts Almshouses
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk